GRE作文雖然有官方題庫，但題目總數太多讓考生難以做到全部練一遍，因此看完題目直接看對應的范文學習寫法思路就成為了更有效率的做法。下面小編會為大家帶來GRE作文范文賞析。

GRE作文官方題庫ARGUMENT題目：

The following is a recommendation from thepersonneldirector to the president of Acme Publishing Company:

"Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course was able to read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours. Another graduate rose from an assistant manager to vice president of the company in under a year. Obviously, the faster you can read, the moreinformationyou can absorb in a single workday. Moreover, Easy Read costs only $500 per employee, a small price to pay when you consider the benefit. Included in this fee is a three-week seminar in Spruce City and a lifelong subscription to the Easy Read newsletter. Clearly, Acme would benefit by requiring all of our employees to take the Easy Read course."

范文賞析

In this argument, the personnel director of Acme Publishing claims that Acme would stand to gain from improved employee productivity. The improvement would come at the cost of $500 per employee for the enrollment in Easy-Read’s 3-week seminar. To support this claim the director points out that many other companies have claimed to benefit from the seminar, that one student was able to read a long report very quickly, and that another student saw his career advance significantly during the year after the seminar. Scrutiny reveals that itaccomplishes little toward supporting the director's claim.

【此段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument開頭段結構，即：C – E - F的開頭結構，首句概括原文的C(Conclusion)。接下來的一句話概括了原文為了支持他的結論所引用的E(Evidence)。較后尾句中給出開頭段到正文段的過渡句，指出原文在邏輯上存在F(Flaw)。

【此段功能】

本段作為Argument開頭段，具體功能就在發起攻擊。首先，概括原文的結論： Acme的personnel director認為接下來分別列舉了原文為了支持這個結論引用的證據：對小城鎮Leeville和大城市Mason City的對比，論據的歸納用于鋪墊出正文段的具體攻擊。較后點出原文存在邏輯錯誤，引出后面的分析。

First of all, just because other companies benefited greatly from the course does not necessarily mean that Acme will benefit in identical ways. Perhaps the type of reading on which the course focuses is not the type in which Acme Publishing employees often engage in at work. Moreover, since Acme is a publishing company its employees are likely to be excellent readers already and may not have the capacity for much more improvement. In this case, the overall improvements would be far less dramatic and if follows that the productive rate would also be a little underwhelming.

【此段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument正文段結構，即：概括第一個邏輯錯誤的錯誤類型和原文犯錯位置，接下來給出合理的理由和他因來反駁原文。

【此段功能】

本段作為正文第一段，攻擊文章犯的主要邏輯錯誤：錯誤類比。作者認為“Acme可能不會像其他公司一樣從課程中受益”。為此，作者提出了兩種可能性反駁原文：一是課程針對的閱讀可能與Acme工作中的type不同;二是Acme的員工應該已經是excellent reader，課程對他們的閱讀幫助不大。

Secondly, two success stories are not statisticallymeaningful. How many companies used the service and found no improvement? Consider the case of the individual whose career advanced after taking the course—any one of a myriad of other factors might explain that advancement.

【此段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument正文段結構，即：概括第二個邏輯錯誤的錯誤類型和原文犯錯位置，接下來給出合理的理由和他因來反駁原文。

【此段功能】

本段作為正文第二段，攻擊文章犯的主要邏輯錯誤：調查類錯誤。作者認為原文中提到的“兩家公司成功的經歷”不能說明問題。該調查沒有充足的樣本，同時也沒有說明成功公司和失敗公司的比例，而且成功案例也不能排除其他因素的影響。

Thirdly, the director assumes without warrant that the benefits of the course will outweigh its costs. While all of Acme's employees take the 3-week course, Acme's productivity would decline. This decline, along with the substantial fee for the course, could conceivably outweigh the course's long-terms benefits. Without a complete cost-benefit analysis it doesn’t make sense to draw a conclusion.

【此段結構】

本段采用了標準的Argument正文段結構，即：概括第三個邏輯錯誤的錯誤類型和原文犯錯位置，接下來給出合理的理由和他因來反駁原文。

【此段功能】

本段作為正文第三段，攻擊文章犯的主要邏輯錯誤：profit類。作者認為原文不能增加課程的benefits outweigh its costs。接下來。作者列舉了課程會帶來利潤下降的一些原因，包括productivity would decline(員工上課期間生產力下降)，substantial fee for the course(課程的巨額支出)。較后說明沒有cost-benefit analysis，結論不合理。